From: | "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)justatheory(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)ymail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "stark(at)mit(dot)edu" <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>, "ants(at)cybertec(dot)at" <ants(at)cybertec(dot)at>, "hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com" <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>, "robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com" <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com" <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, "josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com" <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Materialized views WIP patch |
Date: | 2013-03-06 22:28:29 |
Message-ID: | AFF73C23-9DA9-44D2-BB81-48DAB6441496@justatheory.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
On Mar 6, 2013, at 1:51 PM, Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)ymail(dot)com> wrote:
> I also think that something should be done about the documentation
> for indexes. Right now that always refers to a "table". It would
> clearly be awkward to change that to "table or materialized view"
> everywhere. I wonder if most of thosse should be changed to
> "relation" with a few mentions that the relation could be a table
> or a materialized view, or whether some less intrusive change would
> be better. Opinions welcome.
Isn’t a materialized view really just a table that gets updated periodically? And isn’t a non-matierialized view also thought of as a “relation”?
If the answer to both those questions is “yes,” I think the term should remain “table,” with a few mentions that the term includes materialized views (and excludes foreign tables).
Best,
David
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tatsuo Ishii | 2013-03-06 22:45:22 | Re: Materialized views WIP patch |
Previous Message | Kevin Grittner | 2013-03-06 21:51:20 | Re: Materialized views WIP patch |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tatsuo Ishii | 2013-03-06 22:45:22 | Re: Materialized views WIP patch |
Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2013-03-06 22:19:56 | Re: Support for REINDEX CONCURRENTLY |