| From: | "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)justatheory(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Cédric Villemain <cedric(dot)villemain(dot)debian(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndquadrant(dot)fr>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Daniel Farina <daniel(at)heroku(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Inline Extension |
| Date: | 2012-01-28 20:46:33 |
| Message-ID: | AFE61E58-7F3D-4A9C-9D91-8658ED39425F@justatheory.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Jan 27, 2012, at 2:19 AM, Cédric Villemain wrote:
>> Also --exclude-extension?
>
> It might be the default.
> We need something to dump the content of
> pg_catalog.pg_extension_script (or whatever table is going to contain
> SQL code), per extension or all.
I think dim said --no-extensions would be the default, but I’m thinking it would be useful to have --with-extensions to include them all, but then be able to --exclude-extension for a select few.
Best,
David
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2012-01-28 21:08:36 | isolationtester seems uselessly rigid as to length of permutation |
| Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2012-01-28 20:44:32 | Re: 16-bit page checksums for 9.2 |