From: | "Albe Laurenz" <all(at)adv(dot)magwien(dot)gv(dot)at> |
---|---|
To: | "Alain Roger *EXTERN*" <raf(dot)news(at)gmail(dot)com>, <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Stored Procedure / function and their result |
Date: | 2007-03-20 07:47:19 |
Message-ID: | AFCCBB403D7E7A4581E48F20AF3E5DB201C43AE4@EXADV1.host.magwien.gv.at |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Alain Roger wrote:
> I would like to know if there is a better way how to retrieve
> result from a stored procedure (function) than to use 'AS
> res(col1 varchar, col2 timestamp,..)'
>
> for example, here is a stored procedure :
> CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION SP_A_003(username VARCHAR)
> RETURNS SETOF RECORD AS
[...]
Yes, there are two ways to avoid this.
1.) define a composite type:
CREATE TYPE sp_a_result (
name varchar,
firstname varchar,
userlogin varchar,
statustype varchar
);
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION SP_A_003 (username VARCHAR)
RETURNS SETOF sp_a_result AS ...
2.) Use output parameters (for Versions >= 8.1):
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION SP_A_003 (
username IN VARCHAR,
name OUT varchar,
firstname OUT varchar,
userlogin OUT varchar,
statustype OUT varchar
) RETURNS SETOF record AS ...
You can find a more verbose description in
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/xfunc-sql.html
Yours,
Laurenz Albe
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Poornima | 2007-03-20 09:28:41 | Job Opening for PostgreSQL DBA in Pune. |
Previous Message | Richard Huxton | 2007-03-20 07:35:36 | Re: Optimizing warm standby. Will this work? [PITR WAL] |