Re: should INSERT SELECT use a BulkInsertState?

From: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
To: Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>
Cc: Zhihong Yu <zyu(at)yugabyte(dot)com>, Ibrar Ahmed <ibrar(dot)ahmad(at)gmail(dot)com>, Luc Vlaming <luc(at)swarm64(dot)com>, houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>
Subject: Re: should INSERT SELECT use a BulkInsertState?
Date: 2021-11-04 12:24:21
Message-ID: AF742DB8-2992-4826-B85B-1FC36BBEF3A9@yesql.se
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On 27 Sep 2021, at 02:08, Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com> wrote:

> I split off the simple part again. If there's no interest in the 0001 patch
> alone, then I guess it should be closed in the CF.

Since the thread has stalled, maybe that's the best course of action here. Any
objections from anyone on the thread?

--
Daniel Gustafsson https://vmware.com/

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Daniel Gustafsson 2021-11-04 12:34:33 Re: standby recovery fails (tablespace related) (tentative patch and discussion)
Previous Message Daniel Gustafsson 2021-11-04 12:12:13 Re: LogwrtResult contended spinlock