Re: RV: bad result in a query!! hopeless

From: "Jose Antonio Leo" <jaleo8(at)storelandia(dot)com>
To: "pgsql-general" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: RV: bad result in a query!! hopeless
Date: 2002-10-16 13:36:31
Message-ID: AEEGKNMMPPBJJDLEJDODKELOCJAA.jaleo8@storelandia.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

-----Mensaje original-----
De: pgsql-general-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
[mailto:pgsql-general-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org]En nombre de Richard Huxton
Enviado el: miércoles, 16 de octubre de 2002 15:14
Para: Jose Antonio Leo
CC: pgsql-general
Asunto: Re: [GENERAL] RV: bad result in a query!! hopeless

>Because it will have to check the index 75,000 times and then fetch that
>many records from the table. That means it's probably going to read all
>the disk-blocks anyway, so the index is just complicating things.
ok

>You might find a partial index helps a little on the descriptions, but
>it won,t do much. See the docs on CREATE INDEX .... WHERE

You thinks is better a partial index or a view or both?

Jose antonio Leo

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Doug McNaught 2002-10-16 13:39:34 Re: Queries take forever on ported database from MSSQL -> Postgresql
Previous Message Robert John Shepherd 2002-10-16 13:30:09 Queries take forever on ported database from MSSQL -> Postgresql