From: | "Jonathan S(dot) Katz" <jonathan(dot)katz(at)excoventures(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, w^3 <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Static pages for PUGs? |
Date: | 2012-01-26 14:35:51 |
Message-ID: | AEEE4E88-13A3-4F32-A2D3-CC4F9B60545E@excoventures.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-www |
On Jan 26, 2012, at 9:23 AM, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 15:21, Alvaro Herrera
> <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>> Excerpts from Magnus Hagander's message of jue ene 26 06:37:12 -0300 2012:
>>> On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 23:52, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
>>>> WWW,
>>>>
>>>> Since pugs.postgresql.org has died, do we want to create some static
>>>> pages for the various active PUGs, which will have links to the mailing
>>>> list and external resource (wordpress, Meetup.com, etc.) for each?
>>>
>>> I think the general idea was to have a wiki page (or more) for each.
>>> And probably a wiki category for all of them (Category:UserGroups for
>>> example). That will also give you an automatic index.
>>
>> So would we have a redirect from pugs.postgresql.org to that wiki
>> category?
>
> We could if we wanted to, yes :-) But first, we need to actually have
> those pages on there...
Would a viable alternative be to use the organizations from the main site and just classify which ones are PUGs?
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2012-01-26 14:40:49 | Re: Static pages for PUGs? |
Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2012-01-26 14:23:36 | Re: Static pages for PUGs? |