Re: implicit cast of empty string to timestamp

From: "James Harper" <james(dot)harper(at)bendigoit(dot)com(dot)au>
To: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: implicit cast of empty string to timestamp
Date: 2006-02-12 02:53:30
Message-ID: AEC6C66638C05B468B556EA548C1A77DAF0814@trantor
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Not my application :(

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tom Lane [mailto:tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us]
> Sent: Saturday, 11 February 2006 01:59
> To: James Harper
> Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [GENERAL] implicit cast of empty string to timestamp
>
> "James Harper" <james(dot)harper(at)bendigoit(dot)com(dot)au> writes:
> > How much trouble am I going to get into by modifying the pg_cast
table
> > to call my function instead?
>
> You can doubtless hack it to work if you slash-and-burn hard enough.
> The question is why don't you fix your buggy application instead ...
>
> regards, tom lane

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tim Hart 2006-02-12 05:33:58 Seeking comments on schema design and data integrity
Previous Message Michael Glaesemann 2006-02-12 00:44:52 Re: Each foo must have a bar