From: | John Scalia <jayknowsunix(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | "pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: building 9.6.1 with a different value for krb-srvnam |
Date: | 2017-01-31 22:06:36 |
Message-ID: | AE8ABFAE-8EF1-42AA-A972-63703F78C91D@gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin |
Reasonably so. I always specify the path for my operations and do not rely on PATH environment variables, but I did not specify where pg_config should look. Does pg_config support the usual -D setting like other pqlib based commands?
Sent from my iPad
> On Jan 31, 2017, at 4:18 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>
> John Scalia <jayknowsunix(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> Quick question. I just built a new edition of 9.6.1 using
>> --with-krb-srvnam=POSTGRES in my configure line. Everything seemed to build
>> properly, however, after installation, I ran pg_config and the line for
>> CONFIGURE shows every option I used except --with-krb-srvnam, So, I'm
>> wondering if the new setting actually made it in there, i.e., it did not,
>> or I just found a bug in pg_config.
>
> Hm, worksforme. Are you sure you're checking the right copy of pg_config?
>
> regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2017-01-31 22:15:16 | Re: building 9.6.1 with a different value for krb-srvnam |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2017-01-31 21:18:23 | Re: building 9.6.1 with a different value for krb-srvnam |