From: | Andrey Borodin <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru> |
---|---|
To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
Cc: | Ben Chobot <bench(at)silentmedia(dot)com>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: BUG #17401: REINDEX TABLE CONCURRENTLY creates a race condition on a streaming replica |
Date: | 2022-02-12 17:03:38 |
Message-ID: | AE561C32-E452-43D5-86EB-1CEB57405F95@yandex-team.ru |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
> On 11 Feb 2022, at 05:12, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
>
> On 2022-02-10 22:41:00 +0500, Andrey Borodin wrote:
>> index_concurrently_swap(newidx->indexId, oldidx->indexId, oldName); // WAL-logged
>> CacheInvalidateRelcacheByRelid(oldidx->tableId); // Not WAL-logged
>> CommitTransactionCommand(); // WAL-logged
>>
>> But I do not know is it expected to work on standby, since relcache
>> invalidation is not logged. Maybe Peter or someone more experienced than me
>> can explain how this is expected to work.
>
> What makes you say that CacheInvalidateRelcacheByRelid isn't WAL logged? It
> should be emitted at the commit, like other invalidation messages?
>
Thank you for the explanation!
FWIW here’s more clean TAP-test reproduction. Sometimes I see
2022-02-12 21:59:02.786 +05 [19629] 004_cic_standby.pl ERROR: could not open relation with OID 16401
2022-02-12 21:59:02.786 +05 [19629] 004_cic_standby.pl STATEMENT: SELECT bt_index_check('idx',true);
In tmp_check/log/004_cic_standby_standby_1.log after running amcheck tests. Exactly as per initial report.
Best regards, Andrey Borodin.
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
0001-Test-B-tree-index-on-standby-during-REINDEX-CONCURRE.patch | application/octet-stream | 5.4 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2022-02-12 21:56:38 | Re: BUG #17391: While using --with-ssl=openssl and PG_TEST_EXTRA='ssl' options, SSL tests fail on OpenBSD 7.0 |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2022-02-12 16:15:12 | Re: A bug with the TimeStampTZ data type and the 'AT TIME ZONE' clause |