Re: Switching to c-ares for pgbouncer?

From: Jeff Frost <jeff(at)pgexperts(dot)com>
To: Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-pkg-yum <pgsql-pkg-yum(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Switching to c-ares for pgbouncer?
Date: 2016-07-12 15:14:09
Message-ID: AE47425B-AD18-499E-B4C9-208EBDA534B8@pgexperts.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-pkg-yum


> On Jul 12, 2016, at 8:09 AM, Devrim Gündüz <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org> wrote:
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I was reading this:
>
> https://redmine.postgresql.org/issues/1444
>
> Any objections for switching to c-ares for pgbouncer? From packaging point of
> view, I confirmed that c-ares is available for all supported distros, but I'm
> not sure about the implications.

If the chart is to be believed, the only issue is:

ipv6+CNAME buggy in <=1.10

Do you know which versions are standard in the supported distros these days?

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-pkg-yum by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Devrim Gündüz 2016-07-12 15:31:10 Re: Switching to c-ares for pgbouncer?
Previous Message Devrim Gündüz 2016-07-12 15:09:22 Switching to c-ares for pgbouncer?