From: | Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
---|---|
To: | 'Tom Lane' <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Rod Taylor <rbt(at)zort(dot)ca> |
Cc: | Hackers List <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Really annoying comments... |
Date: | 2002-04-21 18:37:30 |
Message-ID: | AE0489E2D9F21E4FB5A2DDBBA713908D01FB01@dogbert.vale-housing.co.uk |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tom Lane [mailto:tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us]
> Sent: 19 April 2002 19:54
> To: Rod Taylor
> Cc: Hackers List
> Subject: Re: Really annoying comments...
>
>
> "Rod Taylor" <rbt(at)zort(dot)ca> writes:
> > COMMENT ON DATABASE db IS 'Comment';
> > Now switch databases. Comment is gone.
>
> Yeah, it's not very helpful. I'm not sure why we bothered to
> implement that in the first place.
>
> > I suppose in order to add a comment field to pg_database it
> would need
> > to be toasted or something (ton of work). Any other way to
> fix this?
>
> I'm more inclined to rip it out ;-).
Eeep! pgAdmin handles comments coming from multiple pg_description tables
and it works very well (IMHO) in the pgAdmin UI. By all means make them work
more sensibly in whatever way seems most appropriate - I'll fix pgAdmin to
handle it, but don't just rip them out please!!
Regards, Dave.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2002-04-21 18:44:42 | Re: Really annoying comments... |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2002-04-21 18:26:00 | Re: Foreign keys and indexes. |