Re: PSA: upgrade your extensions

From: Daniel Blanch Bataller <daniel(dot)blanch(dot)bataller(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: postgres performance list <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PSA: upgrade your extensions
Date: 2017-02-01 15:18:28
Message-ID: ADBA8F9D-2BD2-4FED-B937-6B00556E1DE7@gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Hi Merlin:

Any EXPLAIN on the query affected? size of indexes before and after reindex?

Regards,

Daniel.

> El 1 feb 2017, a las 13:38, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> escribió:
>
> I was just troubleshooting a strange performance issue with pg_trgm
> (greatest extension over) that ran great in testing but poor in
> production following a 9.6 in place upgrade from 9.2. By poor I mean
> 7x slower. Problem was resolved by ALTER EXTENSION UPDATE followed by
> a REINDEX on the impacted table. Hope this helps somebody at some
> point :-).
>
> merlin
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Vitalii Tymchyshyn 2017-02-01 17:11:12 Re: pgsql connection timeone
Previous Message Vucomir Ianculov 2017-02-01 12:51:58 Re: pgsql connection timeone