Re: invalid memory alloc request size

From: Ben Chobot <bench(at)silentmedia(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: invalid memory alloc request size
Date: 2011-12-27 17:34:34
Message-ID: AD34DAB6-E1F8-421E-BA5D-D3BC53469D89@silentmedia.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Dec 26, 2011, at 8:08 AM, Ben Chobot wrote:

> Yesterday I had a problem on a 64-bit 9.1.1 install:
>
> # select version();
> version
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> PostgreSQL 9.1.1 on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, compiled by gcc-4.6.real (Ubuntu/Linaro 4.6.1-9ubuntu3) 4.6.1, 64-bit
> (1 row)
>
>
> The logs showed this anomaly:
>
> 2011-12-25T19:33:18+00:00 pgdb2-vpc postgres[27546]: [74474-1] ERROR: invalid memory alloc request size 18446744073709551613
> 2011-12-25T19:33:18+00:00 pgdb2-vpc postgres[27546]: [74474-2] STATEMENT: SELECT * FROM "asset_user_accesses" WHERE ("asset_user_accesses"."asset_code" = 'assignments:course_141208' AND "asset_user_accesses"."user_id" = 618503) LIMIT 1;
>
>
> Googling around, it sounds like this is often due to table corruption, which would be unfortunate, but usually seems to be repeatable. I can re-run that query without issue, and in fact can select * from the entire table without issue. I do see the row was updated a few minutes after this error, so is it wishful thinking that vacuum came around and successfully removed the old, corrupted row version?

It also happens that 18446744073709551613 is -3 in 64-bit 2's complement if it was unsigned. Is it possible that -3 was some error return code that got cast and then passed directly to malloc()?

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Kellerer 2011-12-27 18:30:10 Detecting uncommitted changes
Previous Message david.sahagian 2011-12-27 16:33:46 not-always-full vacuuming in 9.0 ?