Re: Release 13 of the PostgreSQL BuildFarm client

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: buildfarm-members(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Release 13 of the PostgreSQL BuildFarm client
Date: 2021-08-03 02:56:40
Message-ID: AC4214D3-79AF-407F-99F2-0F1B9BFB35B5@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: buildfarm-members pgsql-hackers

> On Aug 2, 2021, at 10:12 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
>> --prune-tags possibly is unnecessary. What happens when you remove it
>> from the code?
>
> This:
>
> https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=gaur&dt=2021-08-03%2002%3A07%3A56
>
> which I can't make much sense of.

I guess it’s failing on the ls-remote or symbolic-ref command.

Cheers

Andrew

In response to

Browse buildfarm-members by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2021-08-03 12:47:04 Re: Release 13 of the PostgreSQL BuildFarm client
Previous Message Tom Lane 2021-08-03 02:12:22 Re: Release 13 of the PostgreSQL BuildFarm client

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2021-08-03 02:56:55 Re: A micro-optimisation for ProcSendSignal()
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2021-08-03 02:47:39 Re: Failed transaction statistics to measure the logical replication progress