Re: [CORE] RC1 blocker issues

From: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-core(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [CORE] RC1 blocker issues
Date: 2006-11-25 19:28:04
Message-ID: AC077FBF5451253E89AB9E6F@ganymede.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

- --On Saturday, November 25, 2006 11:00:04 -0800 "Joshua D. Drake"
<jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:

>
>> BTW, if we do change system_views.sql I'm inclined to remove the hack
>> for pg_stat_file() at the bottom, and instead fix pg_proc.h --- initdb
>> can handle this properly now.
>
> There is no reason to rush the release of 8.2, if there are last minute --
> known items. We should fix them. Being a month late, but having a better
> product, is always a better solution.

As rare as he and I agree ... I agree ... LISA is nice and all, but end product
*is* more important then timing, unless you are Microsoft, of course :)

- ----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email . scrappy(at)hub(dot)org MSN . scrappy(at)hub(dot)org
Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ . 7615664
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFFaJlE4QvfyHIvDvMRAhatAKCeumY3DPTmULzSplGWlXR+00qEBwCfUFUz
rI3THgwtRBzvh/JEBBGlrtk=
=/m9d
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Page 2006-11-25 20:20:11 Re: [CORE] RC1 blocker issues
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2006-11-25 19:05:34 Re: Integrating Replication into Core