From: | "Williams, Travis L, NPONS" <tlw(at)att(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Devinder K Rajput" <Devinder(dot)Rajput(at)ipaper(dot)com>, <pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org>, <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [NOVICE] pg or DBI |
Date: | 2002-10-24 18:17:17 |
Message-ID: | AB815D267EC31A4693CC24D234F8291602BA2CB7@ACCLUST02EVS1.ugd.att.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin pgsql-novice |
Unless I am mistaken (which actually happens quite often) DBI is the
base modue that perl uses.. the extension of that DBI::Pg (which is
called in the script) is postgres specific. That is what I am using and
I am new to postgres but have been working with perl for 3-4 years and I
have found it very easy to use.
Travis
-----Original Message-----
From: Devinder K Rajput [mailto:Devinder(dot)Rajput(at)ipaper(dot)com]
Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 12:05 PM
To: pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org; pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: [NOVICE] pg or DBI
Hi all,
I have used pg to connect to postgres. However, I have seen a lot of
people use DBI. Are there any advantages/disadvantages in using one or
the
other for connecting to postgres via perl. Also, which one is more
widely
used? Thanks for your input.
Devinder Rajput
Stores Division Corporate Offices
Chicago, IL
(773) 442-6474
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Hunter Matthews | 2002-10-24 19:05:47 | Re: newbie psql - Backup/Restore - database |
Previous Message | Jeremy Buchmann | 2002-10-24 17:20:50 | Re: pg or DBI |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jason Earl | 2002-10-24 20:11:47 | Re: [NOVICE] pg or DBI |
Previous Message | Jeremy Buchmann | 2002-10-24 17:20:50 | Re: pg or DBI |