Re: Comments on SQL/Med objects

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Comments on SQL/Med objects
Date: 2011-03-28 04:29:06
Message-ID: AANLkTinxT4mDGRn0Jej_N3UGZYJ8V-qMupQcPa43ioJH@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 12:06 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 12:53 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>>> Yeah, I had a private TODO about that.  I'd like to see if we can
>>> refactor the grammar to eliminate some of the duplication there
>>> as well as the potential for oversights of this sort.  I believe
>>> that USER MAPPINGs are missing from ObjectType as well as a bunch
>>> of other basic places ...
>
>> Are you going to work on this?  If not I can pick it up, at least
>> insofar as making the comment stuff work across the board.
>
> I'm still up to my rear in collations, so feel free.

OK. I'll work on it this week.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fujii Masao 2011-03-28 04:48:13 Re: Problem with streaming replication, backups, and recovery (9.0.x)
Previous Message Tom Lane 2011-03-28 04:06:22 Re: Comments on SQL/Med objects