| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Konrad Garus <konrad(dot)garus(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: BUG #5889: "Intersects" for polygons broken |
| Date: | 2011-03-09 20:55:43 |
| Message-ID: | AANLkTinwz9v6diR2NaHSqNA8tJSS94NrNyYTP-Rp4soZ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 3:20 PM, Konrad Garus <konrad(dot)garus(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/functions-geometry.html
>
> I wish it explained what arguments each of the operators accepts, and
> whether any automatic conversions take place (like polygon to box in
> that 8.3 issue).
>
> What happens when I call ?# or ?- on a polygon and point? Two points? Open path?
>
> Some of these are obvious, but others not so much.
Hmm, yeah. That looks like it could be improved. It's certainly not
obvious to me what box * point means, for example, even though the
description says scaling/rotation.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Luke Gilbert | 2011-03-10 03:14:36 | BUG #5922: Add-on installation error. |
| Previous Message | Igor Markovic | 2011-03-09 18:10:09 | Problem with installation |