| From: | Peter Geoghegan <peter(dot)geoghegan86(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Proposal: plpgsql - "for in array" statement |
| Date: | 2010-09-28 12:45:30 |
| Message-ID: | AANLkTinwKnPyM9YqZukNPah7Ns3GfXQ66_k=9tPFC645@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> 2010/9/28 Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)gmail(dot)com>:
>> On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 3:24 PM, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>> I looked on some constructs that helps with iteration over array in
>>> plpgsql. I propose a following syntax:
>>>
>>> FOR var IN [array variable | array expression]
>>
>> What is the benefits compared with
>> FOR ... IN SELECT unnest(array) or generate_subscripts(array) ?
>>
>
> the speed
>
Not to mention that it's far more aesthetically pleasing, and makes
the statement immediately understandable to people unfamiliar with the
plpgsql idioms you describe.
--
Regards,
Peter Geoghegan
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2010-09-28 13:22:05 | Re: security label support, revised |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2010-09-28 12:03:06 | Re: security label support, revised |