Re: Sync Replication with transaction-controlled durability

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Sync Replication with transaction-controlled durability
Date: 2010-12-14 00:47:39
Message-ID: AANLkTinw58Dp0mWTB2P68bFyxum+Lr8rNoSb+Xgb18-A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 11:10 AM, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> This patch is a rough WIP, mostly stripping out and streamlining. It
> doesn't work yet, but people say they like to see me working, so here
> 'tis.

It's been two months since you posted this. Any update?

I'd like to actually review the two patches on the table and form a
more educated opinion about the differences between them and which may
be better, but neither one applies at the moment.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2010-12-14 00:50:21 Re: Transaction-scope advisory locks
Previous Message Robert Haas 2010-12-14 00:44:17 Re: Synchronous replication