| From: | Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Creation of temporary tables on read-only standby servers |
| Date: | 2010-10-22 03:18:10 |
| Message-ID: | AANLkTinv573YnRF2LNaMnqwA8JbJXc5OyZBX8oeQFrck@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 7:13 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> ... and as I recall, we got rid of it principally because the temp
> tables weren't visible to ordinary catalog lookups, thus breaking
> all sorts of client-side logic.
>
Though that wouldn't be the case if the catalogs held a template.....
Anyways I think this horse has been beaten to death. Whoever
implements it will look at the pros and cons and decide which way
they'll go.
--
greg
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Greg Stark | 2010-10-22 03:26:26 | Re: Floating-point timestamps versus Range Types |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2010-10-22 03:10:47 | Re: crash in plancache with subtransactions |