From: | Filip Rembiałkowski <plk(dot)zuber(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | JotaComm <jota(dot)comm(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Problems with autovacuum and vacuum |
Date: | 2011-01-01 19:22:31 |
Message-ID: | AANLkTinr4NmAJAR+rLiPwhGXRNEgeLFHwaH_fzQ0jBd+@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
2010/12/30 JotaComm <jota(dot)comm(at)gmail(dot)com>
> Hello,
>
> Last week I had a serious problem with my PostgreSQL database. My
> autovacuum is OFF, but in September it started to prevent the transaction
> wraparoud; however last week the following message appeared continuously in
> my log:
>
> WARNING: database "production" must be vacuumed within 4827083 transactions
>
> HINT: To avoid a database shutdown, execute a full-database VACUUM in
> "production".
>
> This message appeared for five to six hours; after that, the message
> disappeared from log. Any idea about what could have happened?
>
>
probably another "wraparaund-forced" autovacuum worker did the job, so the
warnings disappeared
> Every day the vacuum is executed on some tables; and on Sundays it's
> executed on all tables. But as the autovacuum is running since September,
> and it runs for a long time, the vacuum was blocked because autovacuum had
> been running on the same table. How should I procede in this case?
>
hmm. single vacuum process runs for more than 3 months on a table with
1000000000 rows?
this is ... less than 128 rows/second, not good.
I would rather terminate this old process, and start a VACUUM VERBOSE when
the database is less loaded.
How many INS/UPD/DEL you have on this table?
PS. When you fix this, enable autovacuum, to avoid more problems...
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2011-01-01 19:29:45 | Re: Sync Rep Design |
Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2011-01-01 19:03:30 | Re: Sync Rep Design |