From: | DM <dm(dot)aeqa(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | pg9.0.3 explain analyze running very slow compared to a different box with much less configuration |
Date: | 2011-03-24 02:04:21 |
Message-ID: | AANLkTinqz7XpmQHr-Utr4GAR1Ld0PKObxdvF+95xtgbW@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Hi All,
pg9.0.3 explain analyze running very slow compared to old box with much less
configuration.
But actual query is performing much better than the old server.
============old Server===============
OS: CentOS release 5.4 (Final)
Linux Server 2.6.18-164.6.1.el5 #1 SMP Tue Nov 3 16:12:36 EST 2009 x86_64
x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
RAM - 16GB
CPU - 8 Core
disk - 300GB
RAID10 on the disk
Postgresql 9.0.3
Postgres Config:
shared_buffers = 6GB
work_mem = 32MB
maintenance_work_mem = 512MB
effective_cache_size = 12GB
#explain analyze select * from photo;
QUERY PLAN
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Seq Scan on photo (cost=0.00..8326849.24 rows=395405824 width=168) (actual
time=5.632..157757.284 rows=395785382 loops=1)
Total runtime: 187443.850 ms
(2 rows)
============newServer===============
CentOS release 5.4 (Final)
Linux Server 2.6.18-164.6.1.el5 #1 SMP Tue Nov 3 16:12:36 EST 2009 x86_64
x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
RAM - 64GB
CPU - 12 Core
disk - 1TB
RAID10 on the disk
Postgresql 9.0.3
Postgres Config:
shared_buffers = 16GB
work_mem = 32MB
maintenance_work_mem = 1024MB
effective_cache_size = 12GB
# explain analyze select * from photo;
QUERY PLAN
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Seq Scan on photo (cost=0.00..8326810.24 rows=395579424 width=165) (actual
time=0.051..316879.928 rows=395648020 loops=1)
Total runtime: 605703.206 ms
(2 rows)
I read other articles about the same issue but could not find the exact
solution.
I ran gettimeofday() on both machines and got the below results:
Results:
*[Old Server]# time /tmp/gtod*
real 0m0.915s
user 0m0.914s
sys 0m0.001s
*[New Server]# time /tmp/gtod*
real 0m7.542s
user 0m7.540s
sys 0m0.001s
I am not sure how to fix this issue, any help would be in great assistance.
Thanks
Deepak
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Adarsh Sharma | 2011-03-24 04:52:54 | Re: Re-Reason of Slowness of Query |
Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2011-03-24 00:05:12 | Re: Shouldn't we have a way to avoid "risky" plans? |