From: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Hitoshi Harada <umi(dot)tanuki(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: wip: functions median and percentile |
Date: | 2010-10-01 08:46:45 |
Message-ID: | AANLkTinqF5SKmFawSV+Nro3DLbY9wUJ_TNuq2ZWYFAmS@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-rrreviewers |
Hello
2010/10/1 Hitoshi Harada <umi(dot)tanuki(at)gmail(dot)com>:
> 2010/9/26 Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>:
>> Hello,
>>
>> there is updated version - with support of window clause. The limits
>> are work_mem for using inside window aggregate or unlimited when it is
>> used as standard query.
>>
>> This patch needs a few work - can share a compare functionality with
>> tuplesort.c, but I would to verify a concept now.
>>
>> Comments?
>
> Sorry for delay. I read the patch and it seems the result is sane. For
> window function calls, I agree that the current tuplesort is not
> enough to implement median functions and the patch introduces its own
> memsort mechanism, although memsort has too much copied from
> tuplesort. It looks to me not so difficult to modify the existing
> tuplesort to guarantee staying in memory always if an option to do so
> is specified from caller. I think that option can be used by other
> cases in the core code.
There are two factors - a) tuplesorts should to uses only memory, b)
data can be sorted again and again. I'll look on possible tuplesort
modifications on weekend.
Pavel
>
> Regards,
>
>
> --
> Hitoshi Harada
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Fujii Masao | 2010-10-01 09:13:02 | Re: Using streaming replication as log archiving |
Previous Message | Dean Rasheed | 2010-10-01 08:35:12 | Re: WIP: extensible enums |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2010-10-01 13:05:43 | Re: wip: functions median and percentile |
Previous Message | Hitoshi Harada | 2010-10-01 08:24:23 | Re: [HACKERS] top-level DML under CTEs |