From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: pg_last_xact_replay_timestamp meaning |
Date: | 2011-03-19 02:21:46 |
Message-ID: | AANLkTinpDU5ms=w43-fpwh4t6PO0GXwR3z6=b2EvPKL5@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 9:35 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 7:23 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
>> I just applied a doc patch for pg_last_xact_replay_timestamp, and the
>> text now says:
>>
>> <entry>Get timestamp of last transaction replayed during recovery.
>> This is the time at which the commit or abort WAL record for that
>> transaction was generated on the primary.
>> If no transactions have been replayed during recovery, this function
>> returns NULL. Otherwise, if recovery is still in progress this will
>> increase monotonically. If recovery has completed then this value will
>> remain static at the value of the last transaction applied during that
>> recovery. When the server has been started normally without recovery
>> the function returns NULL.
>>
>> Is this really the last commit/abort record or the last WAL record?
>> What should it be? Is the name of this function correct? Do we care
>> only about commit/abort records? Why?
>
> Commit and abort records have a timestamp. Other WAL records don't.
Incidentally, there's an open item related to this:
* pg_last_xact_replay_timestamp limitations
linking to http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/201012071131.55211.gabi.julien@broadsign.com
I'm not sure why this is important enough to be worth being on this
list, but... is this resolved now?
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2011-03-19 02:22:22 | Re: pgsql: Document the all-balls IPv6 address. |
Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2011-03-19 02:19:09 | Re: pgsql: Document the all-balls IPv6 address. |