From: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | silly sad <sad(at)bankir(dot)ru> |
Cc: | pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: |
Date: | 2010-07-05 07:18:02 |
Message-ID: | AANLkTinp4KY-BN1mzHlaYDxwIuyoc8EM2xT9mrMyVknm@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-sql |
2010/7/5 silly sad <sad(at)bankir(dot)ru>:
> On 07/05/10 11:03, Pavel Stehule wrote:
>>
>> 2010/7/5 silly sad<sad(at)bankir(dot)ru>:
>>>
>>> On 07/05/10 10:43, Pavel Stehule wrote:
>>>
>>>> The good size for text or bytea is less than 100M and real max isn't
>>>> 2G but it is 1G. LO isn't these limits because it isn't accessable on
>>>> SQL level.
>>>
>>> any regular file on my filesystem isn't accessible on SQL level.
>>> i am happy with them and never tried to store at a database.
>>
>> this is second extreme - you can use everything if you know what you
>> do - and mainly it depends on applications and requests that you have
>> to solve.
>
> the trouble is the initiator of the thread didn't determine what is his
> problem either storing of a zero-byte containing string or storing of huge
> strings.
> I answered him about BYTEA and he replied about BLOB.
> I only tried to say i didn't say a word about BLOB.
yes
>
> P.S.
> Practically for storing pictures i prefer regular files.
>
how I say - it depends on application - sometime can be useful have to
access to all data only from db connect - for million small pictures
the bytea can be best.
Pavel
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | silly sad | 2010-07-05 07:28:53 | Re: |
Previous Message | silly sad | 2010-07-05 07:10:59 | Re: |