From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Mike Fowler <mike(at)mlfowler(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Re: Adding XMLEXISTS to the grammar |
Date: | 2010-06-27 21:55:50 |
Message-ID: | AANLkTinoKG4lUKs-8DVgzb7C2UOqIHMwMT1991FLywYL@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 12:04 PM, Mike Fowler <mike(at)mlfowler(dot)com> wrote:
> Thanks again for your help Robert, turns out the fault was in the pg_proc
> entry (the 3 up there should've been a two!). Once I took the grammar out it
> was quickly obvious where I'd gone wrong.
Glad it was a helpful suggestion.
> Attached is a patch with the revised XMLEXISTS function, complete with
> grammar support and regression tests. The implemented grammar is:
>
> XMLEXISTS ( xpath_expression PASSING BY REF xml_value [BY REF] )
>
> Though the full grammar makes everything after the xpath_expression
> optional, I've left it has mandatory simply to avoid lots of rework of the
> function (would need new null checks, memory handling would need reworking).
So if you don't specify the xml_value, what does the xpath_expression
get applied to?
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2010-06-27 22:05:49 | Re: pg_dump's checkSeek() seems inadequate |
Previous Message | David Fetter | 2010-06-27 19:40:44 | Re: GSoC - code of implementation of materialized views |