Re: [PATCH] Re: Adding XMLEXISTS to the grammar

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Mike Fowler <mike(at)mlfowler(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Re: Adding XMLEXISTS to the grammar
Date: 2010-06-27 21:55:50
Message-ID: AANLkTinoKG4lUKs-8DVgzb7C2UOqIHMwMT1991FLywYL@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 12:04 PM, Mike Fowler <mike(at)mlfowler(dot)com> wrote:
> Thanks again for your help Robert, turns out the fault was in the pg_proc
> entry (the 3 up there should've been a two!). Once I took the grammar out it
> was quickly obvious where I'd gone wrong.

Glad it was a helpful suggestion.

> Attached is a patch with the revised XMLEXISTS function, complete with
> grammar support and regression tests. The implemented grammar is:
>
> XMLEXISTS ( xpath_expression PASSING BY REF xml_value [BY REF] )
>
> Though the full grammar makes everything after the xpath_expression
> optional, I've left it has mandatory simply to avoid lots of rework of the
> function (would need new null checks, memory handling would need reworking).

So if you don't specify the xml_value, what does the xpath_expression
get applied to?

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2010-06-27 22:05:49 Re: pg_dump's checkSeek() seems inadequate
Previous Message David Fetter 2010-06-27 19:40:44 Re: GSoC - code of implementation of materialized views