Re: Fwd: What do these terms mean in the SOURCE CODE?

From: Vaibhav Kaushal <vaibhavkaushal123(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Fwd: What do these terms mean in the SOURCE CODE?
Date: 2010-11-20 19:08:42
Message-ID: AANLkTinnu4bFjTtuCQAsHYRfp9SUfT12NijDcEJ80FQA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

I sure do respect that. Appreciated. :)

-Vaibhav (*_*)

On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 12:33 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 1:59 PM, Vaibhav Kaushal
> <vaibhavkaushal123(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > Thanks a lot for the answer. I see a lot of people discussing so many
> things
> > so I thought my email would have been ignored by those with a lot coming
> in
> > already. Thanks for the enlightenment.
>
> Sure. Just FYI, with these kinds of things, I do try to keep track of
> them because I like to try to make sure that everyone gets an answer
> back. But, I don't always have time to do it immediately, and
> sometimes I wait even if I do, if I think that someone more
> knowledgeable on that particular topic might chime in.
>
> --
> Robert Haas
> EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
> The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2010-11-20 19:41:03 Re: [PATCH] Custom code int(32|64) => text conversions out of performance reasons
Previous Message Robert Haas 2010-11-20 19:05:33 Re: Latches with weak memory ordering (Re: max_wal_senders must die)