| From: | Josh Kupershmidt <schmiddy(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-docs <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Large SGML Cleanup |
| Date: | 2010-11-03 13:12:28 |
| Message-ID: | AANLkTinkOBt2OkW8w6ZNO_54hnWjCv_5c4+CRcmMYa9a@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs |
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 12:12 AM, Alvaro Herrera
<alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
> Maybe we could have additional commands in the "check" rule to invoke
> some HTML validator.
Yes, it would be very nice to do this once we have all the HTML output
fixed up to be valid.
The w3c-markup-validator package I installed actually installs some
CGI scripts under apache, and the Perl package I used had to
communicate with it as a web service to get validation results. Pretty
clunky IMO, and not great as a dependency for "make check", though
maybe there's a standalone validator out there.
Josh
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2010-11-03 13:14:47 | Re: Large SGML Cleanup |
| Previous Message | Josh Kupershmidt | 2010-11-03 13:09:13 | Re: Large SGML Cleanup |