Re: peer-to-peer replication with Postgres

From: Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Mike Christensen <mike(at)kitchenpc(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: peer-to-peer replication with Postgres
Date: 2010-05-10 16:30:51
Message-ID: AANLkTinkAU5Id67t6XSpa6QXq2TN0YFBT5sLSwi2kjjL@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 10:12 PM, Mike Christensen <mike(at)kitchenpc(dot)com> wrote:
> I'm considering using a cloud hosting solution for my website.  It
> will probably be either Amazon, Rackspace or Hosting.com.  I'm still
> comparing.  Either way, my site will consist of multiple virtual
> server instances that I can create and destroy as needed.  Each
> virtual machine instance will be self contained, meaning it'll run the
> website and its own instance of postgres.  The website will only talk
> to the local DB instance.  However, if I'm running several machine
> instances, I want all the databases to keep in sync preferably with as
> little lag as possible.
>
> This is not a master/slave replication issue where there's one big DB
> that's always up and everything syncs to, this is basically total
> peer-to-peer replication where any time data is updated on one server,
> an update command gets sent to all the other servers.  I would also
> have to address the issue when I provision a new virtual server, I'd
> have to import the current data into the DB seamlessly.
>
> What's the best way to do this?

I think right now you're stuck coding it up yourself. No small task.

>  Looks like something like pgPool
> might be what I want, but I haven't looked into it deeply yet.
> Thanks!!

The only thing that gets close is bucardo.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kynn Jones 2010-05-10 16:58:36 How to do pg_dump + pg_restore within Perl script?
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2010-05-10 16:02:21 Re: Documentation availability as a single page of text