Re: Useless sort by

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: gnuoytr(at)rcn(dot)com
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Useless sort by
Date: 2010-09-23 04:46:16
Message-ID: AANLkTinjaB1Y_9U+pt1hF-GOHPyQuTaFDkRJRmyR=DUa@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 11:05 PM, <gnuoytr(at)rcn(dot)com> wrote:
> Spoken like a dyed in the wool COBOL coder.  The RM has no need for order; it's set based.  I've dabbled in PG for some time, and my sense is increasingly that PG developers are truly code oriented, not database (set) oriented.

I'm struggling to think of an adequate response to this. I think I'm
going to go with: huh?

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message gnuoytr 2010-09-23 13:51:16 Re: Useless sort by
Previous Message Scott Marlowe 2010-09-23 04:18:27 Re: Useless sort by