Re: documentation for committing with git

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: documentation for committing with git
Date: 2010-08-04 13:34:01
Message-ID: AANLkTini_FzS7_UH13bpDo1XZHn6-_wCJ3WHodqPVt4G@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 9:29 AM, Heikki Linnakangas
<heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> Hmm, if I understand correctly, Daniel talks about data loss when using
> "alternates", if you e.g delete a branch and run "git gc" in the parent
> repository, because the child repository referring to the parent via the
> alternate reference can depend on objects in the parent repository that are
> no longer required by the parent repository itself.
>
> I guess that applies to multiple workdirs too, if you have staged but
> uncommitted changes in the staging area of a workdir. This message
> http://kerneltrap.org/mailarchive/git/2007/10/11/335637 agrees. Shawn O
> Pearce's last paragraph says:

You might want to edit your new section so that it refers to some of
the earlier material rather than duplicating it.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Heikki Linnakangas 2010-08-04 13:38:16 Re: Synchronous replication
Previous Message Dean Rasheed 2010-08-04 13:31:40 Re: Proposal / proof of concept: Triggers on VIEWs