Re: Native XML

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Mike Fowler <mike(at)mlfowler(dot)com>, "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>, Anton <antonin(dot)houska(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Native XML
Date: 2011-02-28 15:36:51
Message-ID: AANLkTinhwx7=xhJoXpqH5hGuDrSarP1DV7ZzLkuFzNX1@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 10:20 PM, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> wrote:
> No, I think the xpath implementation is from libxml2. But in any case, I
> think the problem is in the whole design of the xpath_table function, and
> not in the library used for running the xpath queries. i.e it's our fault,
> and not the libraries. (mutters about workmen and tools)

Yeah, I think the problem is that we picked a poor definition for the
xpath_table() function. That poor definition will be equally capable
of causing us headaches on top of any other implementation.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2011-02-28 15:40:01 Re: Native XML
Previous Message Tom Lane 2011-02-28 15:30:18 Re: Native XML