Re: BUG #5841: rank()+1 fails, 1+rank() succeeds

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: jeff(at)biccard(dot)com
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-bugs <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: BUG #5841: rank()+1 fails, 1+rank() succeeds
Date: 2011-01-21 17:59:31
Message-ID: AANLkTingY5a3unPNrgg+QfmOX0cU4VWrFtFUcCvvJOuX@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 6:19 AM, <jeff(at)biccard(dot)com> wrote:
> Thanks for clarifying. I've submitted a note on the interactive version of
> the docs, and attached a small patch to make explicit that a window function
> is followed _immediately_ by an OVER clause, as the syntax[1] indicates.

I've committed the first hunk of this patch, as I think it's useful
and innocuous. The second half looks like bad grammar to me.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2011-01-23 02:51:33 Re: BUG #5837: PQstatus() fails to report lost connection
Previous Message Giacomo Petillo 2011-01-21 16:31:21 Bug in italian help of "pg_dumpall"