Re: standby registration (was: is sync rep stalled?)

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Markus Wanner <markus(at)bluegap(dot)ch>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: standby registration (was: is sync rep stalled?)
Date: 2010-10-05 19:08:31
Message-ID: AANLkTinexwAJx=ALKXV2Pr_7HOotbDHOsyJh9bfZzcNT@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 2:30 PM, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-10-05 at 10:41 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
>> Much of the engineering we are doing centers around use cases that are
>> considerably more complex than what most people will do in real life.
>
> Why are we doing it then?

Because some people will, and whatever architecture we pick now will
be with us for a very long time. We needn't implement everything in
the first version, but we should try to avoid inextensible design
choices.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2010-10-05 19:11:20 Issues with Quorum Commit
Previous Message Robert Haas 2010-10-05 19:06:14 Re: leaky views, yet again