Re: Documentation for "PostgreSQL 9"?

On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 7:47 PM, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 23:55, Joshua D. Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
>> On Sat, 2010-12-11 at 00:53 +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>>> Why is there documentation for "PostgreSQL 9", here:
>>>
>>> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9/static/index.html
>>>
>>> 9.0 also exists, but this came up first in Google.  Isn't this prone to
>>> create confusion about the version numbering?
>>
>> Yes I would think so.
>
>
> Indeed.
>
> Where did you find a link to "9"? It should really only show up as
> such if there's a link on our site to it somewhere, and I can't find
> it - and thus cna't remove it...b

I just tried this using google.com

http://www.google.com/search?q=link%3Ahttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.postgresql.org%2Fdocs%2F9%2Fstatic%2Findex.html&hl=en

sites that link to http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9/static/index.html

gives the following:

1. http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/runtime-config-wal.html
2. http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/app-pgresetxlog.html
3. http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/release-8-2-6.html
4. http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/functions-sequence.html

The bread crumb links (Home → Documentation → Manuals → PostgreSQL 9)
seem to be the issue.

- Martin -