From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | mike(at)mlfowler(dot)com |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Adding xpath_exists function |
Date: | 2010-05-07 02:40:59 |
Message-ID: | AANLkTindcyMH87hwvFH-cLwRNMCdsMbDPCrxdqg-Lj_g@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-rrreviewers |
On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 5:53 PM, <mike(at)mlfowler(dot)com> wrote:
> Quoting Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>:
>
>>
>> I'm not sure I understand how this more convenient than just using
>> xpath() with exists()?
>>
>
> It will save a lot of complexity in WHERE clauses. For example using
> exists() in xpath() you might construct something like:
>
> WHERE array_dims(xpath('exists(/foo/bar)','<bar><foo/></bar>'::xml) IS NOT
> NULL ...
>
> Whereas a dedicated xpath_exists() would look like:
>
> WHERE xpath_exists('/foo/bar','<bar><foo/></bar>'::xml) ....
>
> I accept this example is quite basic, but I hope it illustrates the added
> usability. I think xml in sql is complex enough, especially when you start
> considering namespaces, that anything we can do to simplify common use cases
> can only help improve the uptake of postgres xml.
Oh, I see. Well, that might be reasonable syntactic sugar, although I
think you should make it wrap the path in exists() unconditionally,
rather than testing for an existing wrap.
Please email your patch to the list (replying to this email is fine)
and add it here:
https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/commitfest_view/open
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2010-05-07 03:24:51 | Re: including PID or backend ID in relpath of temp rels |
Previous Message | Takahiro Itagaki | 2010-05-07 02:19:33 | Re: pg_stat_transaction patch |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Mike Fowler | 2010-05-07 09:46:55 | Re: Adding xpath_exists function |
Previous Message | mike | 2010-05-06 21:53:23 | Re: Adding xpath_exists function |