| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Craig Ringer <craig(at)postnewspapers(dot)com(dot)au>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Re: Proposed Windows-specific change: Enable crash dumps (like core files) |
| Date: | 2010-11-22 19:27:43 |
| Message-ID: | AANLkTincyEtxP3=qmyoEusrH-SFsMg3j62XEdZskyWpe@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 1:28 PM, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
> I think the reasonable options are either "don't backpatch at all" or
> "backpatch the same way as we put it in HEAD, which is probably
> included in backend". I agree that sticking it in contrib is a
> half-measure that we shouldn't do.
>
> *IF* we go with a contrib module for 9.1 as well, we could backpatch
> as contrib module, but I think that's the only case.
I agree with this, certainly.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2010-11-22 20:06:43 | Re: Per-column collation |
| Previous Message | Jeff Janes | 2010-11-22 19:27:30 | Re: Instrument checkpoint sync calls |