| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, fazool mein <fazoolmein(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Synchronous replication - patch status inquiry |
| Date: | 2010-09-01 16:03:55 |
| Message-ID: | AANLkTinbUsAYMNFjVfumc9SoiatmQmec5=n1YRK_XqDf@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 6:23 AM, Heikki Linnakangas
<heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> I'm not sure what we should aim for in the first phase. But if you want as
> little code as possible yet have something useful, I think 'replay' mode
> with no standby registration is the way to go.
IMHO, less is more. Trying to do too much at once can cause us to
miss the release window (and can also create more bugs). We just need
to leave the door open to adding later whatever we leave out now.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David E. Wheeler | 2010-09-01 16:08:04 | Re: array_agg() NULL Handling |
| Previous Message | David E. Wheeler | 2010-09-01 16:02:12 | Re: array_agg() NULL Handling |