Re: More detailed auth info

On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 16:40, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 10:34 AM, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
>> Um, none of the fields I've suggested so far was "connection string".
>> In fact, that would be Pretty Darn Hard without modifying the client
>> to actually *send* the connection string. Which id doesn't.
>
> So... is there centralized structure which contains the info you're
> thinking of exposing?

No, not today. That's what would have to be created. (And before you
or somebody says something, no, it's not on the CF, so this is likely
a 9.2 feature unless that structure thingy turns out to be a lot
*less* code than I think it will)

--
 Magnus Hagander
 Me: http://www.hagander.net/
 Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/