| From: | Dmitriy Igrishin <dmitigr(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Terms. |
| Date: | 2010-09-17 19:03:22 |
| Message-ID: | AANLkTinaqVNoyXf0MmtT2KX+zeHnhTSRPkWW1+3sovfZ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs |
Hey Robert,
Hmm. The existing text might be redundant, but I don't think it's
> inaccurate. Since the rest of the section alternates back and forth
> between the two terms, it seems like this might help to remind the
> reader that they are effectively synonymous.
>
I am the reader and just a user of libpq, not a guru :-).
I must admit that this is a trifle, but I think it's indeed inaccurate.
Also I think, that it's inaccurate to call one function PQnfields()
and another PQftablecol(). Yes, terms "field" and "column" are
interchangeable, but (personally) I don't clearly understand why two
functions named not monotonous.
But all of the above is my personal point of view. So, just ignore it
if you don't like it :-)
Regards,
Dmitriy
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2010-09-19 02:23:06 | Re: Terms. |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2010-09-17 12:55:25 | Re: Terms. |