| From: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Dmitriy Igrishin <dmitigr(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jan Urbański <wulczer(at)wulczer(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: hstores in pl/python |
| Date: | 2010-12-13 15:01:35 |
| Message-ID: | AANLkTinac58O9aFuu8ioBBpS1=Y0+qufYJp5R+a-y2_a@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
2010/12/13 Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>:
> On Monday 13 December 2010 15:27:48 Pavel Stehule wrote:
>> 2010/12/13 Dmitriy Igrishin <dmitigr(at)gmail(dot)com>:
>> > Hey Pavel,
>> >
>> > 2010/12/13 Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
>> >
>> >> Hello
>> >>
>> >> this is little bit offtopic, sorry.
>> >>
>> >> I am thinking, so we need a standard associative array support in core
>> >> - like Perl, Python or Javascript. So, I don't think, so migration of
>> >> hstore to core is good idea.
>> >
>> > Could you tell why in-core associative array support would be better
>> > than in-core hstore support ?
>> > We enjoying to use hstore and thinking that it is implemented great.
>>
>> Because hstore is PostgreSQL specific type. More well known syntax is
>> better. More - who know, what is hstore? But everybody know, what is
>> associative array or hash.
> So youre disturbed by the name?
>
name and interface - hstore is designed as external module - a
internal class can be designed different.
Pavel
> Andres
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Fujii Masao | 2010-12-13 15:08:14 | Re: pg_archivecleanup should remove WAL files also in pg_xlog? |
| Previous Message | Dmitriy Igrishin | 2010-12-13 15:01:11 | Re: hstores in pl/python |