From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: PG 9.0 release timetable |
Date: | 2010-05-29 21:09:02 |
Message-ID: | AANLkTinUgrEg6wBbj-Chr1paF8RzMRGaAJjffHhFswBu@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 4:19 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> Assuming we want a release Postgres 9.0 by mid-August, here is how the
> timetable would look:
>
> Need RC release to be stable for 1-2 weeks before final
> RC must be released by August 1
> Beta must be stable for 2-3 weeks before RC
> Stable beta must be released by early July
>
> So, we have 5-6 weeks to get a stable beta. Looking at the open issues:
>
> http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PostgreSQL_9.0_Open_Items#Resolved_Issues
>
> it looks like we are doing OK, but we must continue progressing.
This is a really short list. Several of these items have already been
fixed, and others have been discussed extensively and are just a
question of making a final decision. The thorniest question we have
yet to resolve is what to do about max_standby_delay - I think we need
Tom and Heikki to review this patch by Simon:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2010-05/msg01666.php
The real question in terms of release, I think, is how long we want to
wait for more bugs to be found, and/or how much time do we want to
allow for Tom and others to do further review of the code.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2010-05-29 21:11:17 | Re: Performance problem in textanycat/anytextcat |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2010-05-29 20:43:54 | Re: Performance problem in textanycat/anytextcat |