Re: Merged Model for libpq

From: Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: John R Pierce <pierce(at)hogranch(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Merged Model for libpq
Date: 2011-04-01 21:54:44
Message-ID: AANLkTinUEPgKZci8Pa1CVscD48FtDyUainLGbHnV=qf0@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 4:47 PM, John R Pierce <pierce(at)hogranch(dot)com> wrote:
> On 03/31/11 9:34 AM, Annamalai Gurusami wrote:
>>
>> Would it be possible to implement the client server protocol into an API
>> interface, without involving the TCP/IP network?
>
> sure, done already.  'domain sockets', the default for local connections
> that don't expressly call for localhost

er, yes, but that's not the whole story -- everything still has to go
through the protocol, parsing, marshaling, etc.

it's of course fairly trivial problem to wrap spi into libpq-ish
interface but it's pointless until we have explicit transactions
imnsho.

merlin

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message John R Pierce 2011-04-01 22:17:10 Re: Merged Model for libpq
Previous Message John R Pierce 2011-04-01 21:47:27 Re: Merged Model for libpq