| From: | Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu> |
|---|---|
| To: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: DropRelFileNodeBuffers API change (was Re: [BUGS] BUG #5599: Vacuum fails due to index corruption issues) |
| Date: | 2010-08-15 21:17:54 |
| Message-ID: | AANLkTinQbJWb9=seuPpBf_oBAQDq_OiZhYUC6Rn8KdAd@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 9:48 PM, Heikki Linnakangas
<heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> On 15/08/10 21:58, Tom Lane wrote:
>>
>> Does anyone have an opinion whether it's likely that any third-party
>> code is calling DropRelFileNodeBuffers directly?
>
> I doubt it. External modules shouldn't be modifying relations at such a low
> level.
Really? What about an index access method?
--
greg
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2010-08-15 21:39:08 | Re: DropRelFileNodeBuffers API change (was Re: [BUGS] BUG #5599: Vacuum fails due to index corruption issues) |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2010-08-15 21:17:50 | Re: DropRelFileNodeBuffers API change (was Re: [BUGS] BUG #5599: Vacuum fails due to index corruption issues) |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2010-08-15 21:29:48 | Re: Inconsistent ::bit(N) and get_bit()? |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2010-08-15 21:17:50 | Re: DropRelFileNodeBuffers API change (was Re: [BUGS] BUG #5599: Vacuum fails due to index corruption issues) |