Re: antisocial things you can do in git (but not CVS)

From: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: antisocial things you can do in git (but not CVS)
Date: 2010-07-21 09:03:33
Message-ID: AANLkTinP_SiKCJu_uZuHLk1BDrqEJ6voxiJQZdEwj8oI@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 02:28, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> wrote:
>
>
> Robert Haas wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 3:12 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Well, I had looked forward to actually putting the real author into the
>>> author field.
>>>
>>
>> What if there's more than one?  What if you make changes yourself?
>> How will you credit the reviewer?
>>
>>
>
> I think our current practice is fine. Put it in the commit log.

If nothing else, I think this definitely falls under the "minimum
changes first" policy. Let's start by doing things exactly as we're
doing now. We can then consider changing this in the future, but let's
not change everything at once.

--
 Magnus Hagander
 Me: http://www.hagander.net/
 Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Oleg Bartunov 2010-07-21 09:20:47 Re: Query results differ depending on operating system (using GIN)
Previous Message Markus Wanner 2010-07-21 08:33:51 Re: dynamically allocating chunks from shared memory