Re: Do we want SYNONYMS?

From: Dmitriy Igrishin <dmitigr(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Michael C Rosenstein <mcr(at)mdibl(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Do we want SYNONYMS?
Date: 2010-12-06 20:26:45
Message-ID: AANLkTinPP4szV_ZjL8X_jMTKAttjbAjjy_5KeAQTqbG=@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Hey Michael,

2010/12/6 Michael C Rosenstein <mcr(at)mdibl(dot)org>

> Synonyms would be very helpful to us. We just migrated our application from
> Oracle, where we used synonyms to toggle between between two schemas: one
> schema could be loaded with new data, while synonyms pointed the web
> application to the live schema. Once the data load was done, we switched the
> web app's synonyms to switch to the new live schema.
>
Interesting. What is "schema" in this context?

>
> We've hacked a solution in Postgres using search paths, but search paths
> don't work as well as synonyms when the target objects are not in the same
> schema ("database" in PG-ese, I think).
>
> /mcr
>
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
>

--
// Dmitriy.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2010-12-06 20:27:31 Re: Do we want SYNONYMS?
Previous Message Dmitriy Igrishin 2010-12-06 20:23:15 Re: Do we want SYNONYMS?