From: | Dmitriy Igrishin <dmitigr(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Michael C Rosenstein <mcr(at)mdibl(dot)org> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Do we want SYNONYMS? |
Date: | 2010-12-06 20:26:45 |
Message-ID: | AANLkTinPP4szV_ZjL8X_jMTKAttjbAjjy_5KeAQTqbG=@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Hey Michael,
2010/12/6 Michael C Rosenstein <mcr(at)mdibl(dot)org>
> Synonyms would be very helpful to us. We just migrated our application from
> Oracle, where we used synonyms to toggle between between two schemas: one
> schema could be loaded with new data, while synonyms pointed the web
> application to the live schema. Once the data load was done, we switched the
> web app's synonyms to switch to the new live schema.
>
Interesting. What is "schema" in this context?
>
> We've hacked a solution in Postgres using search paths, but search paths
> don't work as well as synonyms when the target objects are not in the same
> schema ("database" in PG-ese, I think).
>
> /mcr
>
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
>
--
// Dmitriy.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2010-12-06 20:27:31 | Re: Do we want SYNONYMS? |
Previous Message | Dmitriy Igrishin | 2010-12-06 20:23:15 | Re: Do we want SYNONYMS? |