From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Cc: | Steve Singer <ssinger_pg(at)sympatico(dot)ca>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: log_hostname and pg_stat_activity |
Date: | 2011-02-10 15:13:05 |
Message-ID: | AANLkTinOvEpnVegtAMiiDiGQci8y0Xi5Mc7-bcsv0Mu6@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 1:33 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 1:09 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
>> On tis, 2011-01-18 at 19:24 -0500, Steve Singer wrote:
>>> However if I connect with a line in pg_hba that matches on an IP
>>> network then my client_hostname is always null unless log_hostname is
>>> set to true. This is consistent with the behavior you describe but I
>>> think the average user will find it a bit confusing. Having a column
>>> that is always null unless a GUC is set is less than ideal but I
>>> understand why log_hostname isn't on by default.
>>
>> Well, we have all these track_* variables, which also control what
>> appears in the statistics views.
>>
>> After thinking about this some more, I think it might be better to be
>> less cute and forget about the interaction with the pg_hba.conf hostname
>> behavior. That is, the host name is set if and only if log_hostname is
>> on.
>
> +1 for doing it that way.
I think there are no outstanding issues with this patch of any
significance, so I'm marking it Ready for Committer.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2011-02-10 15:19:58 | Re: patches that could use additional reviewers |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2011-02-10 14:46:24 | Re: postponing some large patches to 9.2 |