| From: | Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: system catalogs page |
| Date: | 2010-09-17 17:22:55 |
| Message-ID: | AANLkTinMfnOQZPC6Y-nypxUuomrQr+HNVLOPaF_YhGW_@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 17 September 2010 18:17, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I was just noticing that, on this page here:
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.0/static/catalogs.html
>
> ...all of the catalogs are in alphabetical order, except for
> pg_db_role_setting, which is filed in the place in alphabetical order
> where it would belong if the name were spelled pg_setting.
or pg_role_setting
> Is there any reason I shouldn't go fix this?
Looks wrong to me, so I'd say should be fixed.
--
Thom Brown
Twitter: @darkixion
IRC (freenode): dark_ixion
Registered Linux user: #516935
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2010-09-17 17:28:34 | Re: system catalogs page |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2010-09-17 17:20:37 | Re: Report: removing the inconsistencies in our CVS->git conversion |