| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Daniel Farina <drfarina(at)acm(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: One Role, Two Passwords |
| Date: | 2011-01-21 02:12:30 |
| Message-ID: | AANLkTinMbm=A5vfXRU7n+DzuiUtwPdc7vqu302QAQSB1@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 9:07 PM, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> wrote:
> * Robert Haas (robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com) wrote:
>> It strikes me that it would be useful to have a GUC that sets the
>> owner of any new objects you create (much as you can control their
>> default schemas using search_path).
>
> There was a great deal of discussion along these lines over the summer
> of '09 (iirc) with regard to default owners and with the default
> privileges patch. I encourage you to try and make it happen though.
I'm not likely to write a patch for it, but if someone else writes one
I would be willing to (a) support it and (b) subject to consensus,
commit it.
To 9.2.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Daniel Farina | 2011-01-21 02:14:22 | Re: One Role, Two Passwords |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2011-01-21 02:08:10 | Re: REVIEW: EXPLAIN and nfiltered |